Join us! - MTBC Events and Field Trips

Close this search box.

Bats and Mosquito Control

The arrival of Zika virus in America has triggered widespread alarm and a search for mosquito control remedies. It is carried by mosquitoes belonging to the genus Aedes that appear to be active both night and day. As in the control of other mosquitoes, a variety of options should be considered.

Existing chemical pesticides typically cause more long-term problems than they solve. Chemical poisons kill natural mosquito predators more effectively than mosquitoes. Over time, predators of mosquitoes such as fish, other insects, and bats (with much smaller populations and slower reproductive rates), die out while mosquitoes develop resistance, multiplying in ever larger numbers in a losing battle often referred to as “the pesticide treadmill.”1 As resistance develops, larger quantities or increased toxicity are required, eventually threatening environmental as well as economic and human health.

A little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in flight in Wisconsin. One bat can catch up to 1,000 mosquito-sized insects in a single hour.

Bats are primary predators of the vast numbers of insects that fly at night, and some species consume large numbers of mosquitoes when they are available. However, mosquito control is a complex problem that rarely can be solved by a single approach.

For many years biologists debated whether or not predators, including bats, could help reduce mosquito abundance. Some pointed out that, overall, mosquitoes comprised only a small fraction of prey found in bat stomach and fecal analyses. This is true. But no allowance was made for the fact that studies were often conducted at times and places where mosquitoes were either rare or absent. When mosquitoes are abundant (the only times when we’re concerned!), even some of America’s largest, seemingly unlikely bat species have been found consuming large numbers in a single meal.2

Biologists at the University of Michigan were the first to conduct an experimental assessment of the impact of bats on mosquitoes. They documented that bats can significantly reduce numbers of ovipositing mosquitoes and suggested that “bat predation on mosquitoes could help regulate disease vectors.”3 A Wisconsin study documented frequent bat predation on 15 species of mosquitoes, including 9 that harbor West Nile virus.4 Claims that bats are irrelevant to pest control typically come from those who benefit from sales of chemical alternatives or bat exclusion services.

Individuals of some bat species can capture up to 1,000 mosquitoes in a single hour,5 and large colonies can consume amazing quantities. For example, a Florida colony of 30,000 southeastern bats was calculated to capture 50 tons of insects annually, including over 15 tons of mosquitoes,6 and from 77.4% to 84.6% of little brown bats living in the northern U.S. and Canada eat mosquitoes. 7,8 Because mosquitoes do not take evasive action, and are exceptionally easy to capture, bats sometimes appear to prefer them over larger prey.9, 10 Bats can be attracted to live in bat houses,11 and nursing mothers can eat up to their body weight in insects nightly.12

Nevertheless, despite the number of mosquitoes that bats eat, the simple provision of additional roosts should not be promoted as more than one potentially helpful step toward solving mosquito problems. In some cases, bat houses may help and in others, they may not. Bats are one of several groups of animals that naturally prey on mosquitoes. Their importance varies from none to high in different locations.

Little brown myotis living in a bat house in New York.

Where human activities have greatly simplified once diverse habitats, predators of pests may decline to the point of irrelevance. For example where single crops cover large areas there may be too few alternative prey between crops to feed insectivorous animals. Loss of biodiversity threatens whole ecosystems, which cannot be restored by simply providing bat houses. Mosquito-eating bats may also die out in some areas due to loss of suitable hibernation caves. Finally, over use of pesticides may preclude help from natural predators in general.

It is unrealistic to even attempt total control of mosquitoes. In most cases, this is impossible for more than brief periods, though mosquito numbers can be substantially reduced. Poisoning will only exacerbate long-term problems.

The first lines of defense should always include elimination of as much temporary standing water as possible and can be as easy as regularly emptying (or changing) water from flower pots, birdbaths, clogged rain gutters, or other water-holding containers.  Such simple approaches can work wonders in reducing mosquitoes. Finally, introducing mosquito-eating fish into permanent ponds and providing roosts for bats can further aid in success. Responsible mosquito reduction typically requires a multifaceted approach.

Bat houses are most likely to succeed where bats are already known to use old buildings. Such roosting habitat is gradually being replaced by structures that are unsuitable for bats, forcing them to find new roosts or die. All American bats are beneficial in keeping the vast numbers of night flying insects in balance, though their primary diets vary considerably.

Building bat houses is an especially good and timely idea quite aside from any hoped-for impacts on mosquito control. Millions of American bats have recently been killed by an accidentally introduced fungus, Pseudogymnoascus destructans.15 It causes white-nose syndrome (WNS). You can help survivors rebuild populations by providing summer homes. Our bats are worth billions of dollars annually in agricultural protection alone.16

Plans for building several kinds of artificial roosts are readily available, including structures capable of housing from dozens to thousands of bats.17 If you’d prefer to buy a bat house, beware of cheap imitations that fail to meet bat needs. The best bat houses will be caulked, tightly sealed, and securely put together with screws. All landing and roosting area surfaces will be roughened to provide secure footing for bats (ideally with cross-cut grooves about 1/16th-inch deep). Roosting spaces will be approximately 3/4-inch wide (no less than 1/2 nor more than 1-inch), and the overall external dimensions ideally should be at least 24 inches tall by 14 inches wide.  All houses should have a roughened landing area extending 4-8 inches below the entry.

David Bamberger with his pair of occupied bat houses on his ranch in Texas.
A third of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in Wisconsin fed on mosquitoes.

Both single and multi-chamber houses can be quite successful, though four-chamber houses have proven most attractive for nursery colonies. All houses, prior to mounting, should receive at least three coats of paint to ensure long-lasting weather resistance. Bats do not like drafty or leaky homes. Black houses are best in the coolest climates, ranging from light or medium brown in the hottest. Bats like to have roosting options, so those who put up at least two to three houses, on average double their probability of success.

Location of mounting is also important. The most successful houses are located within a quarter-mile of a lake, pond, or stream and are at least 10-15 feet above the ground. In areas where average day to night temperature fluctuations in summer are less than 20 degrees F, houses can be mounted on poles in back-to-back pairs, facing north-south or east-west. Where day to night temperature fluctuations exceed 20 degrees, they should be mounted only on buildings (which serve as thermal heat sinks). All houses should receive at least six hours of direct daily sun (even in hot climates). In general, more is better. Bats like amazingly warm homes, though in all but the coldest climates bat houses should be equipped with ventilation slots in either the front or sides, approximately 6-8 inches above the entry to prevent over-heating. Houses mounted on or too near trees are least successful, because they are often too shaded and may also be too vulnerable to predators.

Single chamber houses may hold up to 50 bats, usually less, while multi-chamber houses are more likely to attract nursery colonies of up to 200. Exceptionally large artificial roosts have attracted up to 250,000 or more bats. We are happy to provide the most up-to-date advice on these and varied additional options and welcome reports of unusual successes or failures. Contact us at


  1. Spooner, A.M. Environmental Science for Dummies.
  2. Whitaker, J.O., Jr., C. Maser and L.E. Keller. 1977. Food habits of bats in western Oregon. Northwest Sci., 51:46-55.
  3. Reiskind, M.H. and M.A. Wund. 2009. Experimental assessment of the impacts of northern long-eared bats on ovipositing Culex (Diptgera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes. J. Med. Entomol. 46(5):1037-1044.
  4. Wray, A.K., M.A. Jusino, M.T. Banik, J.M. Palmer, H. Kaarakka, J.P, White, D.L.Lindner, C. Gratton, and M.Z. Peery. Incidence and taxonomic richness of mosquitoes in the diets of little brown and big brown bats. J. Mammalogy, 99(3):668-674.
  5. Rydell, J. 1990. The northern bat of Sweden: Taking advantage of a human environment. Bats, 8 (2):8- 11.
  6. Zinn, L., and S.R. Humphrey. 1976. Insect communities available as prey and foraging of the southeastern brown bat. Proc. 7th Annual North American Symposium on Bat Research, unpubl. paper presented at symposium.
  7. Anthony, E.L.P, and T.H. Kunz. 1977. Feeding strategies of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus, in southern New Hampshire. Ecology, 58:775-786.
  8. Fascione, N., T. Marceron, and M.B. Fenton. 1991. Evidence of mosquito consumption in M. lucifugus. Bat Res. News, 32(1):2-3.
  9. Kalko, E.K.V. 1995. Insect pursuit, prey capture and echolocation in pipistrelle bats (Microchiroptera). Animal Behavior, 50:861-880.
  10. Rydell, J., D.P. McNeill, and J. Eklof. 2002. Capture success of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) feeding on mosquitoes. J. Zool., London, 256:379-381.
  11. Tuttle, M.D., and M. Kiser and S. Kiser. 2004. The bat house builder’s handbook. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, 35 pp. Revised 24 July 2006.
  12. Kurta, A., G.P. Bell, K.A. Nagy, and T.H. Kunz. 1989. Energetics of pregnancy and lactation in freeranging little brown bats Myotis lucifugus. Physiol. Zool., 62:804-818.
  13. 2012. Aerial spraying public health hoax. PEEReview, Fall, pp. 1&12.
  14. Howard, J.J., and J. Oliver. 1997. Impact of Naled (Dibrom 14@) on the mosquito vectors of Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 13(4):315-325.
  15. USGS National Wildlife Health Center
  16. Boyles, J.G., P.M. Cryan, G.F. McCracken and T.H. Kunz. 2011. Economic importance of bats in agriculture. Science, 332(6025):41-42.
  17. Tuttle, M.D., M. Kiser and S. Kiser. 2005. The bat house builder’s handbook. Univ. Texas Press, Austin, 35 pp.       Updated/dp/0974237914

Love our content? Support us by sharing it!


Related Posts

Don't miss a post!

Get all the latest news from MTBC delivered straight to your inbox.

Michael Lazari Karapetian

Michael Lazari Karapetian has over twenty years of investment management experience. He has a degree in business management, is a certified NBA agent, and gained early experience as a money manager for the Bank of America where he established model portfolios for high-net-worth clients. In 2003 he founded Lazari Capital Management, Inc. and Lazari Asset Management, Inc.  He is President and CIO of both and manages over a half a billion in assets. In his personal time he champions philanthropic causes. He serves on the board of Moravian College and has a strong affinity for wildlife, both funding and volunteering on behalf of endangered species.